One recommendation calls for more automation, which the non-profit says will lead to higher-paying jobs
Since 2020, the federal government has committed to provide around $31.4 billion in financial incentives to help attract investment in creating a battery and electric vehicle supply chain, while Ontario has committed an additional roughly $17.4 billion. Such incentives, plus billions of dollars from the Quebec government, have backstopped roughly $46.1 billion in private investments.
Based at Western University in London, Ont., Trillium is advocating for a new menu of “aggressive, selective and targeted” incentives and a shift away from job creation as a primary goal towards “good” jobs.
Aerospace, chemicals, dairy products, pharmaceuticals, primary metals and high-value electronics such as medical devices and wireless communication equipment are all worth targeting under these criteria, the report said.
To not offer incentives “is stupid on its face,” according to the report.
Incentives came into practice in the mid-2000s as a government policy to stop the retreat of auto manufacturers to other jurisdictions. But the report said manufacturing’s overall contribution to Ontario’s gross domestic product has declined since 2004 on both a relative percentage basis as well as an overall basis.
Ontario’s manufacturing productivity — defined as the value of worker output per hour — has declined since 2020, which Trillium attributes to a variety of factors, including the growth of lower-paying jobs such as in food manufacturing.
It also pointed out that the number of vehicles produced has dropped, which has been tied to pandemic trends as well as supply chain hiccups such as the shortage of semiconductor chips.
But the report emphasizes a third factor for manufacturing’s decline in Ontario, saying that financial incentives from governments, such as loans and tax credits, are too often tied to the number of jobs created. It said incentives should be tied to how many “good” jobs are created and other more qualitative metrics, like investments in automation and tooling technologies.
Brendan Sweeney, managing director at Trillium, said automation is often feared as a jobs killer by politicians. But it often leads to higher-paying jobs and requires companies to invest in their plants, both of which are beneficial from a government perspective.
“It’s easy to announce jobs,” he said. “It’s hard to say this will create fewer jobs, but they’ll pay better.”