A Brooklyn Assembly member is allegedly blocking locals from making posts she doesn’t like on her social media pages — and she even dared one critic to take her to court.
Greenpoint’s Emily Gallagher, a Democratic socialist, has been stealthily deleting critical or uncomplimentary comments or has altogether restricted certain users from interacting with her political media pages for as long as she’s been in office, The Post has learned.
That could be a First Amendment violation as a public official, according to experts.
“The parallels between the way that she operates and the way theocracy operates or how fascism starts, it’s right on the money,” Shannon Phipps, the founder of the Berry Street Alliance, told The Post.
Phipps said she has been blocked from Gallagher’s Instagram account since June 2024 after years of publicly blasting the city’s Open Streets program, which the Assembly member supports..
Phipps said she had noticed that her replies in response to Gallagher’s tweets seemingly disappeared shortly after she posted them — possibly as part of an X feature that allows users to “hide” unwelcome interactions.
Other neighbors have lodged similar allegations in recent months — with claims they are being punished for criticizing Gallagher’s policies or simply for asking her to take action on neighborhood issues.
Gallagher’s public Instagram page on Thursday showed minimal negative comments. Various posts indicated that there were numerous comments that were not populating under pictures — an indication that she might have hidden them from the public.
The Post also viewed various screenshots showing that Gallagher restricted several users from directly interacting with her on social media.
“People are being blocked for having a political critique of her, or if you’re posting something about a political issue that you want her to pay attention to. It’s that stuff. It’s not, ‘Emily, you’re fat and ugly.’ It’s the real stuff,” Phipps said.
Denise Meyerson, who has lived in the neighborhood for more than two decades, first noticed she was restricted from commenting on Gallagher’s Instagram posts back in 2021 — the same year the politician took office.
Meyerson had been critical of Gallagher’s support for the McGuiness bike lane and demanded that the politician step in on a plan to turn 300 free parking spots on Meeker Avenue into metered spots.
“I would comment on her posts and then my comments would disappear. It was related directly to neighborhood things, but she always erased comments,” Meyerson said.
The Brooklynite even called out Gallagher for censoring her posts, leaving up only those that were complimentary, but the politician pleaded innocent, screenshots shared with The Post show.
Even more brazenly, the Rochester transplant dared Meyerson to take her complaints to court, saying: “Feel free to take it to court, but it wasn’t intentional. But this tactic of repeatedly commenting on every post with totally inaccurate statements is pretty frustrating!”
Meyerson countered “that’s her attitude.”
“She doesn’t handle being a local politician very well,” Meyerson said. “She’s not really mature enough for the position of being like a diplomat in the neighborhood.”
“It’s very frustrating and it’s not democratic, which they claim to be. It’s absolutely not. It gives me no faith in the local government.”
The censorship is even more egregious because Gallagher does not respond to constituent emails and her office runs limited hours, both Phipps and Meyerson alleged, adding that only those with mirroring viewpoints get a callback.
When reached for comment, Gallagher did not acknowledge allegations around censorship, but said she offers plenty of real-life opportunities for her constituents to connect.
“Our office takes accessibility and availability extremely seriously,” she said in a statement. “We host regular, in-person events and have a public office, open phone lines, and email access. We engage in conversations all day long with constituents — those who agree with us and those who don’t.”
Should Gallagher be found to be deleting or restricting comments, there is no question that she would be acting in clear violation of the First Amendment because her accounts — under the username “emilyassembly” — are clearly marked for office, according to Diane Peress, who teaches constitutional law at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
“A social media page is created so that there can be communication exchanges with your constituents. You can’t block people because you don’t like the message,” Peress said.
Peress pointed to a similar case lodgedagainst President Trump in 2018, which resulted in a federal judge ruling the president could not block critics from his social media pages. A second lawsuit was filed in 2020, but because the case dragged on until Trump was voted out of office, the Supreme Court ultimately dropped it.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has also been hit with several civil suits by people she’s allegedly blocked some would-be followers — a move she admitted to making back in 2019 because they were allegedly harassing her.
But even cyberbullying doesn’t excuse stifling free speech, said Peress.
“If you were doing this as part of your job as a public servant, I cannot think of a case where you can allow some people to post and go back and forth, and you can’t allow other people. You’re basically discriminating because of the message. You can’t do that,” Peress said.
Phipps is considering taking legal action against Gallagher.
The censorship hits especially hard for the civic leader, whose father immigrated to the US from Iran in the late 70s in search of the very freedoms she accused Gallagher of suppressing.
“He left a very violent situation where half of our family was being killed. People were protesting for freedom. They were losing their lives. They were disappearing and being oppressed … I’ve never even been able to go back to the country because it’s been so much turmoil since I was born,” Phipps explained.
“There’s no freedom of speech, there’s no freedom of press. There’s no freedom to engage in politics. It’s a theocracy. It’s all through the eyes of God. So I really have no tolerance for this in Williamsburg in 2025.”