While incidents at Bedford school may predate Bill 21, the divisive environment it has created likely exacerbates the issues we now face.
In the debate surrounding Bill 21 and the recent events at Bedford elementary school, the real problems often feel obscured, making it difficult to identify effective solutions.
Claiming that the situation at Bedford has no connection to religion (Islam in this case) is not only counterproductive but also hinders our ability to address the underlying issues. It seems evident that the reluctance of some teachers to teach aspects of the Quebec curriculum is intertwined with their religious beliefs.
Opposition to specific elements of the curriculum, especially regarding sex education, is prevalent within segments of the Muslim community. This is well known and should not be surprising; what is alarming is the decision by some teachers to take matters into their own hands, undermining the principles of a Quebec public school.
This behaviour is unacceptable and signals a deeper issue that requires serious attention. The way of thinking and the ideologies behind such actions should be combated wisely and effectively.
How has this situation persisted for years while the Coalition Avenir Québec government believes it is effectively upholding secularism? The truth is that the government’s approach, particularly through Bill 21, has been counterproductive. Such laws do not persuade or change minds; instead, they often foster an environment of discrimination.
From the outset, we have argued that Bill 21 infringes on basic rights and cultivates resentment among many within the Muslim community and other affected groups, including among the younger generations. This atmosphere also lends credibility to radical voices, undermining those who advocate for a secular society and creating a harmful narrative of “Muslims vs. Quebec.”
While the incidents at Bedford may predate Bill 21, the divisive environment it has created likely exacerbates the issues we now face.
Moving forward, it is crucial that we, as a society, seek effective ways to promote secularism without discriminating against individuals or communities. The government must exemplify equitable treatment for all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.
A woman wearing a head scarf is not the issue; rather, the true challenge lies in the beliefs of individuals, regardless of their outward symbols of faith. We must combat misconceptions through ideas, open dialogue and inclusion. It is essential to make younger Muslims feel integrated into society, regardless of their level of religious observance, while respecting the laws of the land.
There are existing mechanisms to prevent teachers from abusing their authority, whether to impose personal beliefs or to ignore regulations. This is precisely what we are witnessing with the suspended teachers at Bedford. Bill 21 did not prevent these incidents, and further discriminatory measures will only deepen the challenges we face.
Within many communities, there are voices advocating for reason, secularism and adherence to the law — voices that have been marginalized by Bill 21. The loudest voices often prevail, aided by misguided policies.
We must learn from past mistakes and work together toward a more inclusive and equitable society.
Ehab Lotayef is a poet, writer, community activist and founding member and past president of the Non à la loi 21 coalition.