Canada could become collateral damage if Trump and Vance live up to their campaign rhetoric on trade and security
Donald Trump’s new running mate touched on many of the same notes that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been hitting: championing the working class, domestic production and legal immigration; maligning elites, wasteful spending, unaffordable housing and unfair Chinese trading practices.
It was an impressive introduction to a national audience and suggests the MAGA project has a clear heir to Trump, who is intent on building a durable, mainstream coalition.
But there were plenty of warning signs, too, that their America First agenda may not be good news for the rest of the world. Canada, in particular, which could become collateral damage if Trump and Vance live up to their campaign rhetoric on trade and security.
“Together, we will make sure that our allies share in the burden of securing world peace,” Vance said in his speech Wednesday. “There will be no more free rides for nations that betray the generosity of the American taxpayer.”
Vance’s folksy style befits his status of the author of the bestseller, Hillbilly Elegy, and over the course of 37 minutes, he appeared to win over the bulk of the crowd.
He was deferential if not borderline fawning toward Trump, who sat watching, his ear in a bandage.
Navarro did not seem to get the new memo about toning down the political rhetoric, suggesting President Joe Biden “threw down the woke blue carpet to let in murderers and rapists, drug cartels, human traffickers, Chinese spies, terrorists and a whole army of illiterate illegal aliens to steal the jobs of Black, white and brown Americans.”
Vance’s speech was absent much of the vitriol and calls for retribution that have become MAGA staples. One Canadian in the audience wrote to say that at times he sounded like a traditional rustbelt Democrat.
He blamed Biden’s support for the passage of NAFTA, “a bad trade deal that sent countless good jobs to Mexico”; the entry of China to the World Trade Organization, “a sweetheart deal that destroyed even more good American manufacturing jobs”; and the invasion of Iraq. (The signing of NAFTA and the Iraqi invasion both happened under Republican presidents).
“At each step, of the way in small towns like mine in Ohio, next door in Pennsylvania, and in Michigan, jobs were sent overseas and children sent to war,” he said. “We need a leader who is not in the pocket of big business and who answers to the working man, union and non-union alike.”
He returned time and again to the divide between “the few with comfort and power in Washington and the rest of us.”
“From Iraq and Afghanistan; from the financial crisis and the great recession; from open borders and stagnating wages, the people who govern this country have failed and failed again,” he said.
Nowhere is this failure more apparent, he said, than in the “absurd” cost of housing, the consequence of Wall Street “crashing the economy” and putting builders out of business, as well as the Democrats allowing the country to be “flooded” with illegal aliens.
The solution is to stop “sacrificing” supply chains to global trade, he said. “We’re going to stamp more and more products with that beautiful label: Made in the United States of America,” he said. “We’ll protect the wages of American workers and stop the Chinese Communist Party from building their middle class on the backs of American citizens.”
By the time he had pledged to Americans of all parties that he will give all he has to serve them — “to make this country a place where every dream you have for yourself, your family and your country will be possible again” — even his harshest critics in the room had laid down their swords.
But America First promises to be less benign than it sounds for the rest of the world.
Neo-mercantilist trade and an isolationist foreign policy will leave a mark.
Vance’s logic would apply equally to any future adventurism by Vladimir Putin in the Baltic state or Poland, and his indifference to Ukraine’s fate seems to reflect a similar disinterest in the future of Eastern Europe.
Would a Trump/Vance Administration reaffirm its commitment to NATO’s Article 5 collective-defence principle, or would it accept the establishment of Russian satellite governments in Tallinn, Riga, Vilnius and even Warsaw?
That was left unsaid in Vance’s speech, but no amount of chicken soup can make that prospect comforting.
National Post