Editorial: Sadly, Invoice 21 lives on, however there’s an vital exemption

Ruling regarding minority-language schooling rights is welcome and reveals the worth of sustaining English faculty boards.

Invoice 21, titled An act respecting the laicity of the state, rammed by means of the Nationwide Meeting in June 2019 by the Coalition Avenir Québec majority authorities, stays an pointless, discriminatory and divisive legislation. A central provision bars a number of classes of public sector workers — together with law enforcement officials, lecturers and jail guards — from carrying “non secular symbols” at work. Whereas the legislation claims to be religiously impartial, it’s something however, successfully barring from such jobs these whose non secular beliefs cause them to put on hijabs, kippahs or turbans. (Carrying a crucifix or cross necklace would even be barred, however these can simply be tucked inside a shirt.)

In his complicated, 242-page choice, Decide Marc-André Blanchard made it clear that he took a dim view of the federal government’s fast and really broad use of the however clauses in each the Canadian and Quebec rights charters, whilst he acknowledged that it had the authorized proper to take action. This, he famous, made it inconceivable to overturn the legislation on the premise of its abrogation of the elemental rights being overridden.

You are reading: Editorial: Sadly, Invoice 21 lives on, however there’s an vital exemption

Readmore : Two folks injured after streetcar and rubbish truck collide in Toronto

The choose struck down the prohibition of the carrying of non secular face coverings within the Nationwide Meeting, as a result of it interferes with the appropriate of residents to be certified to take a seat within the legislature.

Of extra speedy import, nevertheless, was his ruling that making use of non secular symbols prohibitions to the English Montreal Faculty Board (and by implication, different English boards) would infringe on the minority-language schooling rights within the Canadian Constitution. The sensible implications of that ruling are welcome. Extra broadly, it’s an encouraging and well timed acknowledgment of the attain of constitutional minority-education rights, simply as English faculty boards are combating for his or her lives. They’ve been in court docket difficult the CAQ authorities’s Invoice 40, which might abolish them and exchange them with service centres, as has been performed within the French sector. Tuesday’s ruling additionally reveals the worth of sustaining the independence of English boards; had they been abolished, it’s exhausting to think about that English service centres would have been prepared or in a position to mount a problem to Invoice 21.

Related Articles

Related Posts


This will close in 0 seconds